Until fairly recently due to sanctions imposed by my eldest daughter, Barbie had never set foot through our front door. Now times have changed there is a second legislator in the house, a sparkly younger sister who seems to be collecting a girl gang that could rival that of Taylor Swift, all fully equipped with blown up lips and dressed in clothing surely made for a smaller doll.

None of these beauties were purchased by myself, some are given as presents and some handed down by friends and family. It’s a difficult one, of course she loves them, with their big eyelashes, blue eyeshadow and heals. Apparently, we are predisposed to like symmetrical faces, big eyes and small noses, but as a parent I want my girls to be exposed to positive body images, to embrace differences/diversity and not to aspire to unachievable aesthetics. The good news is that things might be changing.

Barbie 2016 - new range represents an alternative to the normal body image found in their products
Barbie 2016 – new range


This year an iconic blue-eyed blond with implausible proportions received a long awaited makeover. A new range of the famous Barbie doll has been released including three optional body shapes – petite, tall and curvy – as well as seven different skin tones and 24 hair styles. Toy company Mattel instigated the change to better reflect the diversity of the product’s audience and appeal to the “millennial moms” – a group (according to Mattel) driven by social justice and attracted to brands with purpose and values. This is the brands biggest update since Barbie launched in 1959, and a huge investment so Mattel must believe the value in representing a more realistic female figure whilst of course broadening its appeal. Consumers reaction to Barbies new figure: Guardian video here.

In some cases parents are taking the matter into their own hands, with Tasmanian mother Sonia Singh and UK mother Emma Cayley rolling up their sleeves and getting involved. Both mums living on different sides of the world independently became increasingly concerned about available dolls on the market, questioning the unrealistic standards of female beauty and unhealthy body image, especially it seems the Bratz doll. Their solution, a make under, remove the make-up, add freckles, reduce the lips, plait the hair and redress and Voila, a new demure looking doll. Some say this is disempowering girls from expressing their individuality, to dress they way they want, and to experiment. That by doing this they are conforming to society’s conservative view of women.

So a little experiment… I asked my girls along with their two cousins to draw Barbie, no guides or references. This is what they came up with:


This market is huge business, for each girl knocking back barbie there are many more putting together their girl gang. It’s encouraging that companies like Mattel are reacting to their audience by taking steps to create a more diverse range, although its significance is put into perspective when you look across their range of dolls. It would be nice if this new found sense of responsibility was adopted by more companies and doll lines,  I’m saying nothing of Bratz.

In the end, Barbie still resides at my home, going on extreme adventures, having multiple haircuts and not to mention countless marriages, but her exploits in life and the love my four year old daughter bestows means she doesn’t quite resemble the doll that arrived at the door. No make under required.

barbie after being played with by a 4 year old

Feature image installation by Belgian artist Annette Thas @annettethasartist